Safety & Protection calculator

Arc Flash Calculator

This page is a proportional arc-flash screen built from a known base incident-energy case. It scales that known case to a new working distance and a new clearing time, then shows the adjusted incident energy, an approximate 1.2 cal/cm2 boundary, and the minimum arc rating that would match the screened energy.

Updated July 16, 2026

If a known base case is 8.0 cal/cm2 at 18 in and 0.08 s, moving to 24 in at the same clearing time screens at about 4.5 cal/cm2 and an approximate arc flash boundary near 46.5 in.

Screened energy = base energy x (target time / base time) x (base distance / target distance)^2.

Enter a known incident-energy case plus the base and target distances and clearing times to screen adjusted incident energy and boundary.

Calculator Inputs

Quick Presets

Enter a known incident-energy result or equipment-label value for the same equipment case.

Use the working distance that belongs to the known base incident-energy case.

Enter the new working distance you want to screen.

Use the clearing time tied to the known base incident-energy case.

Enter the new clearing time you want to screen.

Calculation Results

Enter values above to see calculation results

Opens in a new tabOpens in a new tabOpens in a new tab
Calculation history

Example Calculations

Known 8 cal/cm2 base case moved from 18 in to 24 inSame clearing time, longer working distance.InputsBase Incident Energy: 8Base Working Distance: 18Target Working Distance: 24Base Clearing Time: 0.08Target Clearing Time: 0.08
Known 8 cal/cm2 base case with slower clearing timeSame distance, clearing time increases from 0.08 s to 0.20 s.InputsBase Incident Energy: 8Base Working Distance: 18Target Working Distance: 18Base Clearing Time: 0.08Target Clearing Time: 0.2

How to Use

What this arc flash calculator actually does

This page is for a narrow but useful task: you already have a known incident-energy case or equipment-label value for the same equipment configuration, and you want to screen how that energy shifts when working distance or clearing time changes. It is not a fault-current-to-incident-energy engine and it does not replace an IEEE 1584 study.

What you enter

  • Base incident energy: a known value such as an arc-flash study result or existing equipment label
  • Base working distance: the distance tied to that known base case
  • Target working distance: the new distance you want to screen
  • Base clearing time: the protective-device clearing time tied to the known base case
  • Target clearing time: the clearing time you want to compare against the base case

Screening assumption used on this page

The page uses a proportional screen:

Adjusted incident energy = base incident energy x (target clearing time / base clearing time) x (base distance / target distance)^2

That means the tool assumes the same equipment case, the same study basis, and an inverse-square distance relationship while clearing time changes in direct proportion. This is useful for fast comparison, but it is still only a screen built from a known case.

Worked screening example

If a known base case is 8.0 cal/cm2 at 18 in and 0.08 s, then moving the worker to 24 in at the same clearing time screens at about 4.5 cal/cm2. Under the same assumptions, the approximate 1.2 cal/cm2 boundary is about 46.5 in.

If the distance stays at 18 in but clearing time rises from 0.08 s to 0.20 s, the same base case screens at about 20 cal/cm2. That example shows why clearing-time changes can dominate the final energy even when the equipment itself stays the same.

Scope limits that matter

  • This page does not calculate incident energy from available fault current, equipment type, conductor gap, or protective-device settings.
  • This page does not assign an NFPA 70E PPE category.
  • This page does not create labels or approve energized work.
  • This page is useful only when the base incident-energy case is already known and still applies to the same equipment configuration.

The arc flash boundary shown here is the approximate distance where screened incident energy falls to 1.2 cal/cm2. NFPA 70E uses that 1.2 cal/cm2 level for the arc-flash boundary concept. NFPA 70E also requires arc-rated body protection with an arc rating not less than the estimated incident energy when exposure remains inside that boundary.

Use the Short Circuit Calculator when the real question is available fault current. Use the Protection Coordination Calculator when the real question is clearing time or device selectivity. Use a project study when you need actual IEEE 1584 incident-energy calculations, equipment labels, or energized-work decisions.

Common Applications

Screen how a known arc-flash label value changes with a longer or shorter working distance
Compare a known base case against a faster or slower clearing-time assumption
Estimate whether a new working position is still inside the approximate 1.2 cal/cm2 boundary
More applications. Open to review 2 additional use cases.
Create a quick safety discussion from an existing study result without pretending to rerun the full study
Frame whether a full study update is needed when operating conditions have shifted

Frequently Asked Questions

Can this page replace an IEEE 1584 arc-flash study?
No. This page does not derive incident energy from system fault current, enclosure data, electrode gap, or protective-device settings. It only scales a known base incident-energy case to a different working distance or clearing time.
When is this page appropriate to use?
Use it when you already have a study result or equipment label for the same equipment case and want a proportional screen for distance or clearing-time changes. If the equipment case itself changes, the base case may no longer apply.
What does the minimum arc rating mean on this page?
It is the screened incident-energy value itself. NFPA 70E requires arc-rated body protection with an arc rating not less than the estimated incident energy when the worker remains inside the arc flash boundary.
Why does the page show an approximate boundary instead of an exact label distance?
Because the page is scaling a known case rather than running a full incident-energy study. The returned boundary is a proportional 1.2 cal/cm2 screen under the same assumptions used for the base case.

Related Calculators

Browse all calculators